Rote learning: the ugly duckling of student paramedic education?

David Nicholas Long, Lisa Hobbs, Scott Devenish



The intent of this commentary is to ask questions and stimulate discussion amongst academics and paramedic educators as to whether the inherent value of rote learning has simply been lost in the shadow of more recent learning and teaching practices.


paramedicine; higher education; rote learning

Full Text:



Cathcart A, Greer D, Neale L. Learner-focused evaluation cycles: Facilitating learning using feedforward, concurrent and feedback evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2014;39(7):790-802. Available from: DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2013.870969

Johanns B, Dinkens A, Moore J. A systematic review comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: Evaluating effects on development of critical thinking skills. Nurse Education in Practice. 2017;27:89-94.

Clayton L. An effective, active teaching-learning method. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2006;27(4):197-203.

Malatji K. Moving away from rote learning in the university classroom: The use of cooperative learning to maximise students’ critical thinking in a rural university of South Africa. Journal of Communication. 2016;7(1):34-42. Available from:

Benner P. Using the Dreyfus Model of Skill Acquisition to Describe and Interpret Skill Acquisition and Clinical Judgment in Nursing Practice and Education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 2004;24(3):188-99. Available from:

O’Brien K, Moore A, Hartley P, Dawson D. Lessons about work readiness from final year paramedic students in an Australian university. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2013;10(4). Available from:

Carlson J, Karns C, Mann C, Jacobson K, Dai M, Colleran C, et al. Procedures Performed by Emergency Medical Services in the United States. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2016;20(1):15-21. DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1051682



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 David Nicholas Long, Lisa Hobbs, Scott Devenish

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

IJP is an Open Access journal and articles published are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Article copyright remains with individual authors. Authors grant unrestricted copyright license to the IJP. Readers may copy, distribute, build upon, reproduce, and display the work with the proper citation of the original work in this publication.

DPLA Rights statement: The IJP supports the National Principles for Open Access Policy Statement.